Healthcare practices hold some of the most sensitive information about Australians. When that information is accessed in a cyber incident, the consequences for patients can extend well beyond simply replacing a password or cancelling a bank card.
Read MoreMost healthcare practice owners believe they are broadly compliant.
They have practitioner agreements in place, privacy documentation and employment contracts. They have been operating successfully for years and assume that if nothing has gone wrong, their compliance framework must still be fit for purpose.
Increasingly, that assumption is proving to be incorrect.
Read MoreAI tools such as ChatGPT can produce employment agreements that look polished and professional. But polished is not the same as compliant. Here is why healthcare practices should be cautious.
Read MoreMost healthcare practices assume their privacy and consent processes are compliant until something tests them.
That test may be a patient complaint, a data breach, an Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (‘AHPRA’) advertising concern, a staff mistake, a website review, or a question from a prospective buyer during due diligence. By that stage, the issue is rarely just the wording of a policy. It is often a gap between what the clinic says it does and what actually happens day to day
Read MoreFor many practice owners, opening a second clinic feels like the next logical step. The first location is operating well, patient demand is growing and expansion appears commercially sensible. In many cases, the second site is secured quickly once the right premises become available.
Read MoreGrowth is usually viewed as a positive sign in a medical practice. An expanding practitioner base, additional locations, broader service offerings and increasing revenue may all reflect a practice that is evolving and growing. However, what many practice owners later discover is that growing a practice and strengthening it are not necessarily the same thing.
Read MoreMost medical practices today operate using some form of independent practitioner model. For many years, these arrangements have been seen as commercially efficient, flexible and relatively low risk.
However, practice owners are increasingly coming to us with the same question: “Are our agreements still compliant?” In many cases, the answer is no; not because the agreement structure was inappropriate, but because the devil lies in the detail of the specific terms and conditions of the agreement.
Read MoreYou’re trained to identify clinical risks… but what about your practice risk?
Many practice owners assume their business is sound from a legal and commercial perspective. Agreements are in place, the structure has remained unchanged for years, and financial performance appears stable, and everything’s fine, right? What you might find, when examined more closely, a different picture can emerge.
Read MoreMedical practices commonly engage independent medical practitioners through service agreements, where doctors provide services to their patients and the practice supplies rooms, reception, billing infrastructure and administrative support. These structures are widely used across general practice and specialist settings.
Read More