For many medical practices, staffing costs represent one of the highest expenses—and often one of the greatest areas of risk. In the medical field, where patient care is paramount and regulations can be complex, the decision to classify a doctor as either a contractor or an employee is crucial. Getting it wrong can lead to significant legal and financial consequences.

What Is a Contractor, Legally Speaking?

In legal terms, a contractor is an individual who provides specific services to a business under a contract for services, rather than as an employee. This distinction is pivotal because it determines the rights and responsibilities between the parties. Contractors generally have more flexibility in their work schedules, bear their own risks, and are typically responsible for their own tax obligations. They may provide their own equipment and tools and have the ability to subcontract work.

On the other hand, employees are individuals who work under a contract of employment, which usually stipulates their work hours, duties, and remuneration. They are entitled to benefits like paid leave, superannuation contributions, and protection under employment laws.

Why Is the Contractor-Employee Distinction Important?

For medical practices, hiring doctors as contractors can seem like an attractive option because it offers flexibility, potential tax benefits, and a reduction in liability. Contractors are responsible for their own superannuation, leave, and insurance. However, when the classification is incorrect, it can lead to significant financial penalties and legal challenges.

Risks and Rewards for Medical Practices

Flexibility and Specialisation: Contractors often bring highly specialised skills to medical practices, offering flexibility for practices that need coverage without long-term commitments. This can be particularly advantageous in addressing peak periods or covering for staff on leave.
Financial Implications: Medical practices often see contractors as a way to manage costs more effectively. Without the need to pay for leave or other employee benefits, a contractor arrangement may seem more cost-efficient. However, if the classification is wrong, practices can face hefty penalties, backdated superannuation claims, and potential tax liabilities.

Case Studies: Getting It Wrong

There are several examples of how misclassifying a doctor can lead to costly legal ramifications:

Superannuation Claims: A common issue arises when doctors working as contractors for years suddenly claim superannuation contributions, believing they are entitled to them. If the relationship is classified as a contract rather than employment, superannuation may not have been paid. Practices that fail to adhere to the Superannuation Guarantee (SG) laws face significant penalties, including unpaid super calculated at 9.5% of their income plus interest and administrative fees.
Sham Contracting: One recent case involved a practice in Melbourne that transitioned doctors from employees to contractors without proper documentation. The practice was subsequently accused of engaging in sham contracting—a situation where contractors are, in reality, employees. Under the Fair Work Act, this could lead to fines up to $54,000 per contract.
Payroll Tax Issues: In states like Victoria and New South Wales, payroll tax can be a particular issue. The classification of contractors can trigger payroll tax obligations, which some practices mistakenly overlook. Practices may find themselves unexpectedly facing payroll tax audits and demands for unpaid tax.

Consequences of Getting It Wrong

The consequences of misclassifying doctors are severe:

Fines and Penalties: Under the Fair Work Act, misclassification of workers can lead to fines up to $54,000 per misclassified contract. Additionally, if a contractor is deemed an employee, the practice may be liable for unpaid taxes and superannuation, including penalties for failing to comply with the Superannuation Guarantee (SG).
Tax Liabilities: The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) can determine that a contractor is, in fact, an employee for tax purposes. In such cases, the practice is liable for paying back any tax and superannuation that would have been owed if the doctor had been properly classified as an employee.
Legal Exposure: If there is no written contract or if the contract lacks sufficient detail (e.g., no restraint of trade clause), the practice can face disputes about the doctor’s rights and responsibilities. This could include issues of pay, termination, and competition if the contractor starts a competing practice nearby.
Loss of Control: When a doctor is misclassified as a contractor, they may be more difficult to manage in terms of scheduling, work expectations, and quality control. An improperly managed independent contractor may also lack the professional indemnity insurance required by practices, exposing the practice to greater risk.

How to Get It Right

To avoid these risks, medical practices should adopt a contractor compliance framework. Here’s a five-step protocol to ensure proper classification:

Understand the Legal Framework: Familiarise yourself with the relevant legislation governing employment and contractor relationships in Australia, including the Fair Work Act, Superannuation Guarantee, and ATO tax regulations.
Know Your Obligations: Assess your obligations under the law to determine whether your doctors are employees or contractors. Some key factors to consider include control over work hours, delegation, and provision of equipment. The ATO, in particular, will scrutinise the relationship to see if it resembles an employment arrangement.
Draft a Clear Agreement: A well-drafted Practitioner Service Agreement is essential to clearly delineate the relationship between the practice and the doctor. This should outline the doctor’s responsibilities, tax obligations, and any restrictions (such as non-compete clauses or restraint periods).
Leverage Expert Advice: Engage a legal expert to review contracts and ensure that they comply with relevant legislation. A lawyer can also help address any nuances in the relationship that might require special attention, particularly if your practice operates across different states.
Review and Revise Regularly: Laws and regulations change, so it’s essential to regularly review contracts and business practices. This ensures ongoing compliance and minimizes the risk of misclassification as your practice evolves.

Final Thoughts

The decision to classify doctors as contractors or employees is one that requires careful thought and, ideally, legal guidance. Misclassification can lead to significant financial penalties, tax liabilities, and a loss of control over your practice. By following a structured compliance framework and seeking expert advice, you can manage your staffing needs while mitigating the risks associated with contractor relationships.

Medical practices that are proactive in ensuring they follow the right legal processes will benefit not only from greater operational efficiency but also from a secure, compliant foundation for growth and success in the future.

What’s next?

We mentioned the importance of a Practitioner Service Agreement. To streamline this process, we offer a fast-track solution that you can easily purchase through this link. Additionally, we highlighted the value of expert advice—if you have any questions or need assistance, please don’t hesitate to contact us. We’d be delighted to help you navigate this important aspect of your practice.

Related articles

Related webinars

Contractor vs Employee Doctors: Risks & Rewards for Medical Practices